Cost of NF & NPF vs Traditional Infilled Turf Systems?

NF & NPF turf systems have 3-4 times the amount of yarn per m2 vs traditional infilled system therefore the upfront cost is higher. However traditional infilled systems require 10-20% of the performance infill to be replaced annually, the infill to be topped up regularly, the infill needs to be de-compacted, all requiring specialised machinery and skills not to mentioned infill migration issues already mentioned above.

NF & NPF systems are far cheaper and more simple to maintain with removal of organics and contaminants, and deep wash annually. The total cost of ownership of an NF or NPF field is almost identical to a traditional infilled field over a 10 year operating life.

TigerTurf’s newest non-infill turf products, NRG2 and Pure PT are essentially identical in yarn types, Pure PT has longer pile height (40mm) is denser and has a higher stitch rate, making it ideal for high-performance sports and a version is available certified to FIFA Quality standards. NRG2 is shorter pile height (30mm) optimised for multisports offering an excellent all-round non-certified surface for all football types, as cricket outfield and general play area.