UV/weathering tests are useful for comparing products, but an accelerated laboratory exposure time should not automatically be converted into a specific number of outdoor years.
For example, manufacturers may report testing at 2,000, 3,000, 5,000 hours or other exposure periods.
The important information is not just:
“The product passed 3,000 hours.”
You should also ask:
- Which test method was used?
- What radiation and exposure conditions were applied?
- Which property was measured?
- What was the original value?
- What value remained after exposure?
- What acceptance criterion was applied?
Relevant international weathering methods may include ISO 4892 series or applicable ASTM weathering methods, depending on the product and market.
Accelerated weathering is a laboratory comparison tool; it does not provide a universally valid one-to-one conversion into outdoor service years.
Warranty Period vs. Actual Service Life
This distinction is extremely important.
Warranty
A warranty is a contractual commitment subject to defined conditions.
It may specify:
- Duration
- Covered defects
- Acceptable performance thresholds
- Exclusions
- Installation requirements
- Maintenance requirements
- Remedy or replacement conditions
Service life
Service life is the period during which the turf remains sufficiently functional and visually acceptable for its intended application.
A product can remain usable after the warranty expires.
Conversely, improper installation or abnormal use can cause problems before the expected service period.
Therefore:
Warranty period ≠ guaranteed service life
When comparing products, look at both.
Leave a Reply